January 18th, 2010 - Charles-383877 said:
I am 7 for 7 on the Faith issue, I have been aboard CM for two years now and I am hopelessly confused at how many widows post themselves as advocates for premarital sex, I suppose at least their honesty deserves a merit over some of my personal experiences with an ex-Nun a Eucharist Minister and I also dated a Lecherous Federal Agent that had me arrested by the Warren Police in retaliation for my not calling her cellphone often enough. On theat Faith question, I have messaged many ladies to advise them that they may have misunderstood the Faith question, but they never reply ???
(Unother Untold But True Story) by CHARLIE
September 30th, 2009 - Robert-315416 said:
I like the picture because then I know there's actually a person on here. Too often, I get an influx of profile hits and emotigrams from non-responsive people without pictures right when my subscription is about to end. It might be coincidental, but I want to know that the reason I'm keeping this subscription is that I'll actually be talking to real people and not possible fake accounts.
September 28th, 2009 - Gabriele-487355 said:
As they say.....a picture is worth a thousand words!? " Personal Info" and " About Me" is worth the other thousand ...between the the three... .. and...... at least 2 (!) added spices pulled from the faith cabinet " 2 out of the 7"( faith questions.)...and voila...the most important info has been revealed....most important as in being able to decide wheather or not to contact a person. I'm wondering ...are there others out there ...looking for the 2 spices as well or am I the only one? Would appreciate all comments. Thank You!
September 25th, 2009 - Becky-484328 said:
I agree with Omar. People should be allowed to state their opinion without feeling in the wrong. Every detail is important and each might mean something more to someone else. No big deal if picture come on top. hey! i like to see the faces of all online that has commented, it makes it sort of real.
September 23rd, 2009 - Dolores-116480 said:
The question was not "what is most important", but "what is most informative". Just because some people feel that the picture is most informative doesn't mean that they are saying they are only interested in someone's looks. Remember: A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS!!!!
September 23rd, 2009 - Michelle-176368 said:
The results are to me, slightly surprising. I would imagine for a group of people curious about love and faith a persons "about me" would be more informative. If the poll is accurate, then that would give those who aren't contacted much a bummer of an answer, when they wonder why that is.
September 21st, 2009 - Michael-170950 said:
I've always thought to be a combination of a lot of things. Granted, I have met a girl on this site that I find attractive both, so far, inside out, but I think for anyone, some physical attraction as well as spiritual and mental attraction must be combined. I've met people that I don't find attractive at all physially, but are some of the nicest people spiritually and emotionally. I pass on them because I don't find a little physically attractive.
And visa versa. I pass on the women who are 'super hot gorgeous supermodel thin, drop jaw' but are emotionally or spiritually corrupt.
I think to trully be part of a true relationship that you feel comfortable about, there must be a combination.
The girl I met here seem to have all three - physical, mental, and emotional attractiveness...go me.
September 9th, 2009 - Barbara-437833 said:
I think the pictures says a lot - esp after age 40. If they are 49 and look 65, you know they have had some issues with alcohol, drugs, bad diet, disease, etc., which makes them higher risk to be involved with. But, if they look their age or even younger than their age, that tells you they are fairly healthy...which answers one piece of compatibility and chemistry....