June 3rd, 2011 - Lydia-683314 said:
It makes it difficult to know whether to contact someone when doing a search as you have no idea what their criteria is ie.age,logistically compatible, physical attributes i.e height/wt or what/where we match comparatively ntil you read their essays which can be very long.. I'm very disappointed because, in my search and in reading so many profiles, find that we don't match for reasons listed above. etc. The search options should be expanded to be more specific. It would save so much wasted time. Thanks.
February 6th, 2010 - Katy-534448 said:
For search options (searching for men), frankly I'd like to see something for facial hair. It would help refine the search as I prefer clean-shaven (or the weekend version). Realize that can change for a man in five minutes but it's still an optional look for them. Also agree that an age option would be good...allowing a preferred demographic to contact us.
February 1st, 2010 - Jude-76391 said:
I think video dates are awesome. You have an almost real word scenario meeting with this person you are interested in. You can then make a safe assessment on this individual, before you finally meet in person. An almost fool-proof approach towards characterization and assessment of the individual you are interested in.
January 29th, 2010 - Daniel-457681 said:
I'd like to see a mobile version available. I am currently getting updates via email that someone viewed my profile but then have to wai till I get to my home or office to log in and view the persons profile. It's not a crucial feature but I would like to view and browse profiles when I'm on the road or away from a laptop or desk top computer.
January 28th, 2010 - Irene-477602 said:
i think i agree with the woman's comment about screening for older CM members. I am 60 and I think I have to go through all these matches--too much time. more questions would be good also a kind way to say "i'm not interested" due to location; photo; beliefs; family situation; etc. some members have just said "no" to chat but have given no reason--others distance or family problems--help?! That is why i voted for "guided"
January 23rd, 2010 - Peter-44842 said:
Yes, activity status. Also, letting opinions in the fora stand, but having a learned priest occasionally commenting on the theological / Church misinformation one often sees. Even just in a separate discussion column.
Also, not revealing the real number of active profiles seems to me an obvious way of boosting subscriptions.
*** Admin. deleted my last post to this effect. Possibly it raised unsettling questions. Thank you
January 10th, 2010 - America-312924 said:
I agree with Jessie. If CM can improve w/ the chat rooms times, then I'm sure this would capture more members. I avoid all other chat rooms due to the uncontrolled content and unkown entities that is on the other end. Chat rooms are better "ice breakers" if not a decent way just to "mingle" and pass time w/fellow Catholics.
January 9th, 2010 - Kathy-99973 said:
Guided Communication is too slow. Maybe some generic Interview questions that a person could use for their interview. I would rather see Regional Matching, other than State, 500 miles, or entire country. Being able to choose more than one Region would be great: Southeast, South, Mid-Atlantic, as an example. OR more mileage: 1000 miles, 1500 miles, etc.