(Quote) Cheryl-409772 said:
(Quote) Joe-787295 said:
Well, when given only two choices; ...
(Quote) Cheryl-409772 said:
Quote: Joe-787295 said:
Well, when given only two choices; the unborn had a much better chance with Romney than they did Obama. So many accuse Romney of flip flopping on the issue of abortion.
I pray everyday that more people flip flop to the side of life.
When a conservative changes positions, they are doing anything to get elected, when liberals do it they are open minded. How about Obama and gay marriage. Stated it was his position that he was against it, then wow; election #2 - comes out in support of it. What a sincere intellectual this man is.
Plus it is a liberal lie that he flipped flopped on it....he did what he could in a very liberal state....MA was 4 liberals to every 1 conservative and the media ate him up there. We posted sites here that showed what he tried to do to promote the prolife laws....but people who wanted to vote for Obama on here still kept up with the lie telling...and they will have to face that some day when they meet their maker. Romney promised from day one of this election not to use tax dollars to fund planned parenthood...what more did anyone need who had their soul in the right place. At any rate, what he was trying to make his election about this time was about the economy...he kept directing it back to this since it is a mess and Obama's team kept attacking him on a personal level. I am really sick when I think of the people who voted for a man who not only believes it is ok to murder babies...inside or outside of the womb but a man who lied and attacked a candidate who is basically a really decent man with things like ads showing him killing people, etc. I do think these people knew better deep down and whether it is pride that kept them from acknowledging the bishops or a lack of being able to discern what they bishops were saying....well, that remains to be seen in the next life, I guess.
Right, Cheryl, he didn't flip-flop on it. You didn't follow the news too carefully, did you? You're real free with your accusations, aren't you? If you are free to write that what I wrote is a "liberal lie", am I free to write that what you wrote is a a far-right delusion?
George Romney, Willard Romney's old man, was in fact a decent man, and if George was running, we wouldn't be arguing. George was honest, hard-working, and a true American industrial and political hero. One cannot say the same for Willard. George is the one who started the tradition of releasing his income tax returns for public scrutiny. Except for the two he released, Willard is the one who broke it. Willard's wife noted that they wouldn't release any more, because the more they released, the more they got attacked.
Kind of makes you wonder what is in those tax returns, doesn't it?