Faith Focused Dating. Create your Free Profile and meet your Match!

A place to learn, mingle, and share

This room is for discussion for anyone who adheres to the Extraordinary form of the mass and any issues related to the practices of Eastern Rite Catholicism.

Saint Athanasius is counted as one of the four Great Doctors of the Church.
Learn More:Saint Athanasius

Rejecting poinsonous prose

Aug 28th 2013 new
Rejecting poinsonous prose

As I wrote yesterday, the faithful Catholic is required to reject anything that conflicts, either explicitly or implicitly, with the doctrine of the Faith, no matter what the source may be. Furthermore, no one, not even a pope or a valid council of the Church, has the authority to bind anyone to any such conflicting propositions.

In this post, I will provide a specific example from the conciliar text that conflicts with the doctrine of the faith in such way as to lead directly to error, therefore requiring the responsible Catholic, not just to parse it and qualify it and wrench a faithful interpretation from it, but to reject it as a danger to the faithful.

Nostra Aetate 4: Indeed, the Church believes that by His cross Christ, Our Peace, reconciled Jews and Gentiles, making both one in Himself.

The only way one can embrace this statement as an acceptable representation of the Catholic faith is to understand that it speaks exclusively of those Jews who have accepted Jesus Christ as the long-awaited messiah and have entered into the new and everlasting covenant by the waters of baptism. Thats it.

OK, those hell bent on hammering square pegs into round holes will say, you see that! It can be interpreted in continuity with tradition!

Not so fast.

Lets take just a few steps back to remind ourselves of the purpose of every ecumenical council; namely, to teach the truths of the Catholic faith with precision and clarity. The councils of the Church are not symposia wherein bishops are charged with drafting doctrinal riddles so convoluted as to remain, even half a century later, unsolved by even the vast majority of the Churchs hierarchy.

In other words, that a faithful interpretation is narrowly possible for a given statement does not justify in any way binding the faithful to it.

So, back to our example: Has the deficiency of the text from Nostra Aetate 4 led directly to error?

You bet it has, and not just on the part of rank and file liberals, but as I will demonstrate momentarily, on the part of the sacred hierarchy leading all the way to the top,

First, its important to know that the text in question from NA 4 is footnoted to reference Ephesians 2, a passage in which St. Paul informs the gentile believers in Christ that the wall of separation that once existed between themselves and the people of the covenant, the Jews, prior to Christ, is now broken down. How? Through the Cross, as believing Jews, like St. Paul himself, are united with believing gentiles in the Blood of Jesus Christ, making both one in Himself.

What St. Paul is not suggesting in any way, shape or form is that those Jews who rejected Jesus Christ and who look upon His Cross as mere folly, either then or at any time thereafter, are somehow one in Him.

The very notion is laughable indeed, but its not very funny when one considers the degree to which the sacred hierarchy has embraced precisely this utterly untenable interpretation.

At a recent address delivered at Romes Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, Cardinal Koch, President of the Pontifical Commission for Religious Relations with Jews, said that Nostra Aetate is the foundation document and the Magna Carta of the dialogue of the Roman Catholic Church with Judaism.

Reflecting further on the document, he said in reference to the statement in question from NA 4:

The concept of two parallel paths of salvation would in the least call into question or even endanger the fundamental understanding of the Second Vatican Council that Jews and Christians do not belong to two different peoples of God, but that they form one people of God.

Know this: Cardinal Kochs misrepresentation of Catholic doctrine, which reflects a false interpretation of Ephesians 2, is the direct fruit of the deficient text in question from NA 4. More troubling still is that all indications seem to be that even the popes since Vatican II embrace this falsehood, as evidenced by their utter failure to even hint that the Jews stand in need of baptism in order to gain access to the community of salvation.

The slippery slope greased by NA 4 leads to straight to nothing less serious than heresy, which is defined in the Code of Canon Law as the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt after the reception of baptism of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith (Canon 751).

Cardinal Koch demonstrated this very clearly as he continued:

On the one hand, from the Christian confession there can be only one path to salvation. However, on the other hand, it does not necessarily follow that the Jews are excluded from Gods salvation because they do not believe in Jesus Christ as the Messiah of Israel and the Son of God.

Numb though you understandably may be after decades of being exposed to the diplomat-speak of the new evangelists, pinch yourself just hard enough to come to your Catholic senses and consider exactly what the cardinal is saying:

He is publicly proclaiming that even those who explicitly reject Jesus Christ, His Sonship and His Messiahship, are included in Gods salvation! In other words, he is saying that one can reject Christ and yet somehow still accept God.

When we consider that the words of Our Blessed Lord necessarily form the content of that which must be believed by divine and Catholic faith, and that Jesus very clearly said, He who rejects me rejects Him who sent me, we can draw no other conclusion than to say that Cardinal Koch is guilty of professing a material heresy.

This, my friends, is a crystal clear example of just how dangerous certain of the texts of Vatican II are. They lead not just simple laymen to confusion and ultimately to heresy, but even the Princes of the Church!

This is why we must, as a matter of Christian duty to the Lord who is truth incarnate, allow no fear to prevent us from holding such misleading propositions up to the purifying light of sacred Tradition, exposing them for precisely what they are, and rejecting them out of hand.

It should also be clear, therefore, why not even an angel from heaven has the authority to bind us, on any level, to such poisonous prose.

About The Author

Louie Verrecchio is an author, columnist and speaker living and working in the Archdiocese of Baltimore, MD. The Founder and President of Salve Regina Publications, he is one of Catholic News Agencys longest running columnists (since April 2009).

He is the author of the internationally acclaimed Harvesting the Fruit of Vatican II Faith Formation Series which has been helping Catholics on four continents explore the documents of the Council since 2004.

Harvesting is a work not best carried out in the dark of night for obvious reasons, Verrecchio cautions. In the darkness its difficult to distinguish between that which is ripe and sweet and nourishing, from that which is hard and bitter or may not even be fruit at all. As we explore the Second Vatican Council, ours is a work that must be carried out in the light as well, the brilliant and purifying light of sacred Tradition.

To aid in establishing a firm foundation in sacred Tradition, Mr. Verrecchio recently launched the Traditio Faith Formation Series, exploring the magisterium of the pre-conciliar popes, beginning with Quas Primas, the 1925 Encyclical of Pope Pius XI, establishing the Feast of Christ the King.

Mr. Verrecchio is also the author of a number of books including:

Ten Things Every Catholic Should Know About Vatican II
And With Your Spirit Restoring a sense of the sacred in the Roman Missal Third Edition
Was John Courtney Murray Right?
The Most Holy Rosary: A Weapon of Mass Instruction

Mr. Verrecchio has addressed conferences and retreats in dioceses throughout the United States, and his media appearances include EWTN, Church Militant TV, Ave Maria Radio, Relevant Radio and numerous local affiliates. For information about his speaking schedule and honorarium, please send an inquiry via email to

Mr. Verrecchios writing and speaking has received the endorsement of numerous churchmen, theologians, and others including:

  • George Cardinal Pell Archbishop of Sydney, Australia
  • Archbishop Alexander K. Sample Archbishop of Portland, OR
  • Bishop R. Walker Nickless Bishop of Sioux City, IA
  • Fr. Peter F. Ryan, S.J., S.T.D. Kenrick-Glennon Seminary, St. Louis, MO
  • Dr. Marcellino DAmbrosio, Ph.D. Internationally known speaker, author, theologian
  • Mr. James Cavanagh Director of Evangelization, Archdiocese of Denver
  • Russell Shaw Syndicated Columnist

Click for Curriculum Vitae.

Posts 1 - 1 of 1