I did respond to what the Summorum Pontificum says, but when I stated that this wasn't really applicable to the SSPX and why (the SSPX was created to only provide the traditional Mass, so this was a shell game by those who introduced this into the conversation), I was retorted, "Where's that in the SP?" The SP has nothing to do with the discussions between the SSPX and the Vatican anyway.
I noticed also that Paul, you like to attack me publicly. SO I'm calling you on it, once gain. Jerry, I realize you too have Moderator authority, but both of you guys will ask a question to try to challenge someone who doesn't agree with you, and when they do, you instantly change the subject --- even to a tangent, and claim others are getting off track. Then you get in the last word and lock the thread.
And it's funny, because there is a thread in another forum here, "Two Truths and a Lie", because I've seen that game played here by someone whose name i won't mention. It's not ok to say a few truths, and then wrongly accuse that if someone disagrees with something you've said as a conclusion, they disagree with all of your premises, when in reality, they disagree with the premises that are just not true and wishful thinking by a biased person. In my experience, there has been more abuse of moderator power in the forums related to theology than there has been fair play in discussions related to either the traditional Mass or traditional doctrine.
That having been said, I wish you all peace --- not as the world gives, but as Christ, Truth Incarnate gives, whose teachings do not change with the times, and whose sacrifice in the Holy Mass deserves all the reverence and solemnity we can give him.