This room is for the discussion of current events,cultural issues and politics especially in relation to Catholic values.
Saint Thomas More was martyred during the Protestant Reformation for standing firm in the Faith and not recognizing the King of England as the Supreme Head of the Church.
Learn More:Saint Thomas More
There have been a few articles and TV segments on the topic of the Fifty Shades of Grey books as of late. A couple of states have banned the books; because, they categorized the book as 'porn'.
They author states it's a romance novel while most agree it falls in the erotic literature category.
I'm just going to throw out a couple of questions... Feel free to answer one or all or simply share your opinion. Have you read the book(s)? Would your Catholic faith prevent you from reading them? Is it appropriate for a single adult to read novels such as this? Is it appropriate for a married woman or couple to read this book? Do you think banning the books in public libraries is an over-reaction or a sound decision? If you have read it - Why do you think this book steps over a line whereas, other romance novels do not?
The erotic novel "Fifty Shades of Grey" may have topped recent bestseller charts, but it's proven a little too hot for librarians in east central Florida.
According to Florida Today,the Brevard County Public Library system has removed copies of the book from its 17 libraries.
"We bought some copies before we realized what it was," Cathy Schweinsberg, library services director, told the newspaper. "We don't collect porn."
However, as the Post points out, the libraries still offer copies of "The Complete Kama Sutra," "Lady Chatterley's Love," and "Tropic of Cancer," all of which are erotic literary classics.
"["Fifty Shades of Grey"] is not a classic," Schweinsberg responded.
ABC2News.com reports that more than a quarter of a million copies of the book have so far been sold
*titled editted to be a little less.... shocking?
We find the word "classic" tossed about as an excuse for the acceptance of new, when in fact it is nothing new. The introduction of the Gothic novel and the writings of folk like the Marque de Sade are taught as Classic. Justine, The Misfortunes of Virtue, is the purest trash ever written, yet we find that many of the ideas first presented in that first book by Sade surface in places one may not expect. Sigmund Freud uses the theory of sexual motivation as the key to his theory of Psychoanalysis. In parts taken almost verbatim from the works of Sade. We see the idea of "no right to private ownership of property" touted even now in politics. Many of these ideas were first express in Sade's work. The first real explanation of "Utopian Socialism" is found therein.
Does that make it a classic? yes, it does. Should the average person read it? What is average?
At the same time, other writers came up with subjects and prose more to the liking of a moral audience. I guess we can look at two works contemporary to each other, one that describes monks using a needy young girl as a sex slave, or we can read of the trials of a man cursed, then saved by his own transformation of morals. The second ends with these famous words.
He prayeth best, who loveth best
All things both great and small;
For the dear God who loveth us,
He made and loveth all.
I will let you guess which one I consider a classic worthy of reading.
Folks have been writing novels and poems for at least 2850 to 3200 years. Starting with the Iliad and moving up to "The Prince" everybody agrees on what is a classic. From Utopia to "1984" there is room for debate as to what belongs on the list. Only a handful of the tomes written from 1938 till now need consideration.
"Banned" is a loaded word and misused in this case. The book is still available to people in those jurisdictions via interlibrary loan, Amazon, B&N, etc; the government (in this case, the public library) is just choosing not to purchase it/carry it. They choose to purchase or not purchase thousands of books a year. Are all the other unpurchased books also "banned"? Of course not. Public libraries are responsible to the community and therefore have to use money to purchase items with wide appeal that meet community standards. Whoever is responsible for collection management there probably has seen the book on several lists and purchased it on the basis of that; there is a good chance they didn't know what the firestorm the book tends to cause.
Anyway, this book offends primarily because I enjoy literature. This book started out an internet fan fiction and then as an e-book. It only got a publisher because, as David mentioned, porn for housewives is still a socially acceptable way to make $$$$.
I see your point. I was basing the 'banned' statement on the one county that bought the books and them pulled then from the shelves. I think it's fair to say that we don't know if this is the case in other counties/states.
I'm sure the book stores are now filling up 'after hours'. I read an article on line either yesterday or the day before that a place is now offering classes for couples... to um, explore scenes from the book.
Shoot me now holy smokes people
Oh goodness gracious. For I moment I thought you were going to say, 'Whip me now'.
This is good stuff. Next thread, is S&M compatible in a sacramental marriage?
if S & M means Sex and Money - why yes it belongs in a sacrmental marriage some of us can only imagine what a sacramental marriage is
Hello Ms. Nancy,
Great to see your beautiful face in the forums again. Please continue to bless us with your presence.
. . . remember that pornography of whatever type always degrades everyone who comes into contact with it.