As it is a teaching of the Church, not personal opinion, that pre-nuptial agreements that include contingencies for divorce are not permissible, a reminder of forum rule 4, which deals with inflammatory language against the Church, is in order. If you consider the Church's teaching "horsecrap" then perhaps you might find another site more to your liking.
A person with special financial situations such as you list should be working with a canon lawyer and a civil attorney, not ignoring the Church. Is money worth intentionally entering into an invalid marriage (where each sexual act is a mortal sin) and placing their soul in grave jeopardy?
The only reason I'm letting this post remain is because it's three days old and there is no telling how many have read it so far.
yeah yeah. whatever. i'm talking aqbout ESTATE PLANNING not divorce planning.