You wrote.... "Who says that one story has anything to do with another."
What a cop-out. If the two stories were unrelated, then why were they in the same thread. If the two stories were unrelated, then don't you have an obligation to point that out in your original post?
Your responses thus-far remind me of this "The Far Side"... "Boneless Chicken Ranch" cartoon.
Ed, Ed!!! Tsk Tsk Tsk!! I,
I"m only away a short time and there you are, "Personal Attacking!" I see youir little backup hasn't accused you of trawling or ranting Ad Hominem. When we have our own little way we crawl back to old tactics using tired open handed innocent antics. If you are going to throw hypocrisy around be sure you have covered the tag teams tracks better. You made a pious hand ringing plea on the receiving end, which was a not bad impersonation of integrity. Which, I might say you have sent integrity to intensive care. Please no plaintiff pleas about pickin' on poor little me. Bernard had an opinion! Quick get the Modernist filled fire hose and abuse and abuse and abuse and then icing on the cake,"Boneless Chicken Ranch" you've lowered name calling down to pre school sand pit level. Have a nice day Ed. Try to remember what you say and write any problem with that, Johnny will be able to tell what any one has said or is about to say and if you are a good boy he will tell you in non liturgical Latin. (Retrospective ides of March, Little Caesar has come home for the Salad) Et te and all that Jazz. Naughty no complaints you were the one that dumped the verbal bucket of do do's on Bernard. I now know what skills tou have for Ecumenical Reconcilliation. Oh my! Did you step in something, never mind someone will be around with a pooper scooper later to take your argument back to the sewer of life. Ad Hominem! Ad Hominem! Polly wants a cracker!