Sorry, Cindy, I should have made it more clear in my post that I was not referring to you or anyone else personally. Your post was the last one in the thread prior to mine, so I replied to the end of the thread, and not to your post directly. My apologies for the confusion.
The labels I was referring to involve political labels that tend to get tossed around the forums without definitions, so they whip up people's emotions as opposed to advancing a discussion on a topic.
Please do not be offended as I was not referring to any individual in particular.
As an additional reminder, perhaps to myself as well, the "reply and quote" feature is preferable when replying to an individual's post. A general "reply" can be to a particular post or just to the thread in general. If the reply is to the thread in general, it is preferable to indicate your reply is a general one and not a specific one.
But one thing has me puzzled, that I would need to say in my post- this is a general post, or not a specific one. This I never heard of until now. So, knowing how I am, for me to keep writing this on each post it would be too much of a hassle. It is rather degrading. For isn't each post a specific posts? I think that all CM'ers are intelligent enough to read a single post, right?
We each have the freedom of speech, in general opinions, each has their thoughts and feelings. We each have different degrees of knowledge and wisdom.
After this post, I quit. So, I will not need to worry about any post I would be writing. This should be pleasing to hear.
I do appreciate your apology. Best of luck in your endeavers.
May God Bless and keep us.